Friday, March 30, 2012

South Africa v India


South Africa won by 11 runs (D/L method)
South Africa innings (20 overs maximum)RMB4s6sSR
View dismissalRE Levic Sharma b IK Pathan198740271.42
View dismissalJH Kallisc Sharma b Ashwin61584252145.23
View dismissalCA Ingramc Sharma b Raina78595083156.00
F Behardiennot out20221120181.81
View dismissalJL Ontongb Raina2210722314.28
JA Morkelnot out163312533.33
Extras(lb 1, w 2)3
Total(4 wickets; 20 overs; 79 mins)219(10.95 runs per over)
Did not bat J Botha*, DJ Vilas†, WD Parnell, J Theron, LL Tsotsobe
Fall of wickets 1-22 (Levi, 1.4 ov), 2-141 (Kallis, 14.6 ov), 3-168 (Ingram, 17.1 ov), 4-203 (Ontong, 19.3 ov)
BowlingOMRWEcon
P Kumar2022011.00(1w)
View wicketIK Pathan4044111.00(1w)
R Vinay Kumar3032010.66
View wicketR Ashwin403318.25
YK Pathan10909.00
View wicketsSK Raina4049212.25
RG Sharma1014014.00
V Kohli1015015.00
India innings (target: 83 runs from 7.5 overs)RMB4s6sSR
RV Uthappanot out1836191094.73
G Gambhirnot out49362871175.00
Extras(lb 3, w 1)4
Total(0 wickets; 7.5 overs; 36 mins)71(9.06 runs per over)
Did not bat V Kohli, RG Sharma, SK Raina, MS Dhoni*†, YK Pathan, IK Pathan, R Ashwin, P Kumar, R Vinay Kumar
BowlingOMRWEcon
LL Tsotsobe301505.00(1w)
JA Morkel1016016.00
J Theron1013013.00
WD Parnell1.501407.63
J Botha1010010.00
Match details
Toss India, who chose to field
Series South Africa won the one-off match
T20I debuts F Behardien and DJ Vilas (South Africa)
Player of the match CA Ingram (South Africa)
Umpires JD Cloete and S George
TV umpire AT Holdstock
Match referee BC Broad (England)
Reserve umpire KH Hurter
Match notes
  • South Africa innings
  • South Africa: 50 runs in 5.2 overs (32 balls), Extras 2
  • 2nd Wicket: 50 runs in 36 balls (JH Kallis 24, CA Ingram 24, Ex 2)
  • South Africa: 100 runs in 11.2 overs (68 balls), Extras 3
  • CA Ingram: 50 off 38 balls (6 x 4, 1 x 6)
  • JH Kallis: 50 off 36 balls (3 x 4, 2 x 6)
  • 2nd Wicket: 100 runs in 71 balls (JH Kallis 48, CA Ingram 50, Ex 2)
  • South Africa: 150 runs in 16.2 overs (98 balls), Extras 3
  • South Africa: 200 runs in 19.2 overs (116 balls), Extras 3
  • Innings Break: South Africa - 219/4 in 20.0 overs (F Behardien 20, JA Morkel 16)
  • India innings
  • India: 50 runs in 5.5 overs (35 balls), Extras 4
  • 1st Wicket: 50 runs in 35 balls (RV Uthappa 11, G Gambhir 35, Ex 4)
  • Rain: India - 71/0 in 7.5 overs (RV Uthappa 18, G Gambhir 49)

Ingram, Kallis and rain sink India


South Africa v India, only T20, Johannesburg

Ingram, Kallis and rain sink India

Cricket +
South Africa 219 for 4 (Ingram 78, Kallis 61) beat India 71 for 0 (Gambhir 49*) by 11 runs (D/L method)
Jacques Kallis forces one past mid-on, South Africa v India, Only T20I, Johannesburg, March 30, 2012
No jet lag for Jacques Kallis © Associated Press 
Enlarge
Related Links
In the end, it was probably a fitting end to a solitary Twenty20 international sandwiched between South Africa's tour of New Zealand, the Asia Cup and the Indian Premier League. In the end, it was rain that proved decisive in what was shaping up to be a close chase and what could have been the highest successful one in T20Is. In the end, MS Dhoni was once again left to rue the profligacy of his medium-pacers and assorted part-time bowlers.
Gautam Gambhir had launched India's pursuit of 220 in a blaze of boundaries but even a total of 71 for 0 after 7.5 overs proved to be comfortably behind the Duckworth-Lewis par score of 82, such had been South Africa's dominance earlier with the bat.
Half-centuries from Colin Ingram and Jacques Kallis had lifted the hosts to their second-highest T20I total, and the fourth-highest ever. With all his three medium-pacers going for runs, Dhoni was forced to overuse his part-time spinners, who collectively went for 87 in seven overs.
Kallis showed no sign of any jet lag after having flown halfway across the world from New Zealand just in time for this game. Ingram, with a T20I strike-rate of 117.85 before this match, stroked his way to his maiden half-century in the format, his 78 taking 50 deliveries.
There was no respite for India right from the start as their three medium-pacers - with similar pace and reliance on swing - were easily taken for boundaries. Richard Levi provided India a sampler of what was in store for them, dismissively swatting Praveen Kumar and Irfan Pathan for a couple of fours each. Irfan provided temporary relief to his captain when he got Levi to edge one going across to slip but Ingram signalled there would be no let-up with an exquisite punch past point for four off his first ball.
Vinay Kumar began promisingly with an over that went for just two but Ingram and Kallis ensured South Africa were always in charge. India seemed to have stopped the torrent of runs to some extent as R Ashwin and Suresh Raina got through a couple of tight overs but Kallis and Ingram responded in style. Ashwin and Rohit Sharma were dispatched over midwicket for huge sixes.
Dhoni turned to the slow-mediums of Virat Kohli. Kallis lofted him past long-on for four and crashed the next two deliveries past the sweeper cover. After having slog-swept Ashwin over deep midwicket, Kallis found the fielder on the second attempt to depart for 61 off 42 but by then the second-wicket stand had realised 119 off 80.
More punishment lay in store for India as Vinay disappeared for 20 in the 17th over, 14 of those coming in three deliveries against Ingram who slashed, flicked and cut for boundaries.
Though Ingram holed out to deep midwicket off the first ball of the 18th, Farhaan Behardien and Justin Ontong took 14 off the 19th over bowled by Irfan. With Praveen and Vinay available to bowl the last over, Dhoni went for Raina.
Ontong earned ten off the first two deliveries with a loft over extra cover and a slog over midwicket. Though Ontong was bowled off the third, Albie Morkel hammered two sixes and a four off the last three as Raina went for 26 in the over, and 49 in four.
The last ball of the innings typified how shell-shocked India were, as Ashwin lost a straightforward catch in the lights to concede a six at long-on. That stroke boosted South Africa to 219, a score which would require India to better the highest-successful chase in T20Is they achieved against Sri Lanka in 2009.
Gambhir seemed to be in the mood to pull it off on his own, laying into Albie Morkel's first over which went for 16. Before the heavens opened up, it rained slashes, cuts, hooks, top edges and outside edges from Gambhir's bat. India might have gone at a quicker rate but Robin Uthappa struggled to get going at the other end, scoring at below a run-a-ball.
The only other man, apart from Kallis, from the South Africa Test squad to New Zealand to be playing this game, Lonwabo Tsotsobe, squeezed in three overs that went for only 15, ensuring that Duckworth-Lewis went against India.

Is the IPL still the ticket?


Is the IPL still the ticket?

Season five will tell how disillusioned the Indian fan is with the national team's recent performances
Cricket +
Bystanders gather around a shop window to watch a match, Delhi, March 24, 2011
Viewer fatigue will not be a factor in this IPL season © AFP 
Enlarge
A new financial year and a new test for Indian cricket. The first week of April will give us an idea of what the fan, and those who monetise his passion, think about the future of Indian cricket.
A bit like a mid-term poll, the BCCI has asked for a new television partner midway into the arrangement with Nimbus, which is an acknowledgement, maybe, that Indian cricket was overpriced, given that the last deal was valued at the same price as the one before it. Remember, this is not as much about the price as about the returns at that price, something investors in stocks know very well. A State Bank of India share might be a very good asset to possess at Rs 1500, but not quite as good at Rs 3000 maybe.
People good at assessing risk and evaluating assets will take a call on the valuation of Indian cricket early next week. They will budget for the fact that Australia, England and South Africa are all due to visit India in this contract period; that India play better at home than away, which is a factor; that political uncertainty and the fear of an economic slowdown might hit advertising budgets, even the fear that the big cricket stars are slowly moving on. Why, the future of Tendulkar might be a factor, for there is no denying that he pulls in more viewers than anyone else.
Bidders will have to weigh that against the cost of not having Indian cricket on their channels, for that has a rub-off effect on other programming; it provides bargaining power with cable operators, who, in spite of Direct-to-Home, are significant players in the television industry. Some big names, existing channels, and some who desire to establish themselves, are apparently in the fray, and so the 2nd of April should be an important date.
It is not only the on-field itinerary that counts, though. I hope that there is as much emphasis on the content on television and radio as there is on the price. In good markets, product quality and price have a very close relationship.
The first week of April also sees the start of IPL 5. It is a very important year for the IPL. The viewership and attendance figures will give us an idea of whether it is still the hot property it was in its first three years. The reason for the little suspicion is that IPL 4, by its own standards alone, was a slight disappointment. But it was also a peculiar year because India had just won the World Cup, a deeply emotional event, and the IPL began even before the shadows had lengthened. Not only was there a lot of cricket on television, people had already spent fair sums of money on going to cricket grounds. But there was another factor too.
In the months leading up to IPL 4, the presence of two new teams had necessitated another auction, and that led, however gross the parallel might seem, to mass migration. The relationship between fans and players, at the heart of all sport, was severely affected, and everyone, including commentators, was confused initially about who was playing for whom. Things will be better this year on that front, and given how little India have played in India this year, there might be a greater temptation to head towards the cricket ground. Already the Chennai Super Kings are reporting that all Rs 700 and Rs 1200 tickets have been sold for all home games; apparently internet sales have also been pretty good and these are good signs, even if some commentators have recently been spotted shaking a leg in a promo!
IPL 5 will also test the strength of the disillusionment of the Indian fan over recent performances by the national team. History suggests that such disillusionment tends to be short-lived, that the search for a good meal is rarely hampered by the experience of a bad one. There is also the usual debate in some quarters of playing for money over playing for the country. Most people saying that seem to have few problems with accepting it in football and basketball. Just as there are accountants and politicians and artists of all kinds, so too do we have cricketers of many dispositions. And don't forget, not all of them have the option of representing India. The IPL gives them a stage too. But in the end, like with a free and fair election, the public will vote, and this is a big election for Indian cricket.
Don't discount another factor, though. The front pages of India's newspapers, repositories of bad news, have to outdo themselves these days. Poverty needs to be alleviated as much in public life as in our villages. When the news is grim, entertainment has a chance.