Saturday, March 31, 2012

BCCI gets four bids for cricket rights in India


India news

BCCI gets four bids for cricket rights in India

Cricket +
The BCCI has received at least four bids for the broadcast, internet and mobile rights to cricket in India for the period July 2012 - March 2018, ESPNcricinfo has learned. The companies believed to have submitted bids are ESPN Star Sports* (ESS), Multi-Screen Media (Sony), Bennett Coleman, which owns the Times of India, and a consortium involving TV-18 and Reliance.
The bids are being closely watched as they will provide an indication of how valuable the market considers the rights given the board's cancellation of its previous contract with Nimbus Communications over payment problems coupled with the recent poor performances of the Indian team. The bidding period closed on March 26 and the bids are due to be opened on April 2.
Multi-Screen Media has plans to launch a sports channel (likely to be called Six according to Business Standard) and the rights to Indian cricket would give the company a second marquee property after the IPL. MSM also has the rights to FA Cup football and the NBA. ESS, the market leader among sports broadcasters in India, owns the rights to ICC events, as well as the domestic rights for Australia and England. Landing the India rights would give them a virtual stranglehold on premium cricket properties.
According to market sources, Bennett Coleman are likely to bid for the internet and mobile rights rather than the television rights. The company currently owns the internet rights for the IPL in conjunction with Nimbus.
The board was forced to issue a new tender after it terminated its contract with Nimbus in December 2011, claiming the latter had defaulted on its payments. The matter has subsequently been referred for arbitration, with the Bombay High Court ruling that Nimbus must deposit Rs 305 crores (approx US$60 million) with the court as security for the amount the BCCI claims it is owed by the company. Nimbus has also made a counter-claim of Rs 600 crores (approx US$118 million) from the board.
The BCCI's marketing committee set the price for category A games at Rs 31.25 crores per match (approx $6.1 million) plus Rs 1 crore (approx $0.2 million) while category B games were set at Rs 34 crores (approx $6.67 million) plus Rs 1 crore. However, committee chairman Farooq Abdullah did not specify which of the game's three formats fall under each category, nor why a separate rate of Rs 1 crore was mentioned, though one possibility is that the latter is the base price for the digital rights. The contract with Nimbus had a base price of Rs 31.25 crores (approx $6.1 million) per game for each of the three formats purely for the broadcast rights.
The board did attempt to sell the internet rights separately last year, but the tender found no takers at the initial base price of Rs 3 crores (approx $0.6 million) or its subsequently reduced price of Rs 2 crores (approx $0.4 million).

VRV Singh returns, tougher and still hungry


India news

VRV Singh returns, tougher and still hungry

After a back surgery that kept him out of the game for over two years, VRV Singh is on a comeback trail and determined to work through every challenge
Cricket +
VRV Singh steams in, Rest of South Africa v Indians, Potchefstroom, 3rd day, December 9, 2006
VRV Singh: 'Giving up on cricket was never an option. If I had wanted to do that, I would have never gone in for [back] surgery.' © AFP 
Enlarge
Related Links
Players/Officials: Vikram Singh
Teams: India
His deliveries still bounce as steeply as they used to when he first played for India as a chubby 21-year old in 2006. That toothy grin, broad and childlike, has not changed. He still runs in like a locomotive struggling to control its momentum as it rumbles downhill. It is hard to believe that last week's Syed Mushtaq Ali Trophy match against Assam was VRV Singh's first game for Punjab in more than four years.
Four years. The Indian Test middle order had all of its four big batsmen intact four years ago. Anil Kumble was India's Test captain. The IPL had not yet come to town. And the veteran Pankaj Dharmani was leading Punjab. India's cricket map has been altered in four years. And VRV Singh has seen the best and worst of the life of a professional sportsman in these four years.
All he had wanted to do was to bowl as fast as he could. It was said that he needed his coach to console him if he came back from a game without hitting an opposition batsman on the head. No less an authority on fast bowling than Ian Bishop, the former West Indies quick, was impressed after watching VRV Singh in his debut Test in Antigua in June 2006.
And then the injuries arrived. Foot, ankle, back. VRV Singh still tried to keep going through the pain. His pace dropped, lack of match practice ruined his rhythm. He had ankle surgery in 2008, but got injured during a practice match before the Ranji Trophy in 2009, limiting him to playing for Kings XI Punjab in the IPL that year.
He almost disappeared after that, playing just one match in IPL 2010. Forget India, making the Punjab team was appearing to be improbable. It was then that he made the big decision to go in for back surgery in Australia in late 2010. "Initially, the injury was not that bad. But it did not improve much and went on deteriorating," VRV Singh said. "After IPL 2010, I played some local games to see how it went but it was not good."
A whole year would pass after the surgery, before VRV Singh would be able to resume bowling. "You cannot play around with your body in rehab," he said. "I slowly started with exercise for my lower back and hip muscles, then started working out in the gym, then running and eventually began to bowl from two-three steps." He resumed bowling with his normal run-up around December 2011.
It was way back in March 2008 that he had last played for Punjab. That meant he was starting all over again. So the man who has played five Tests for India turned out like any other probable at the trials for the Chandigarh district team. Did he have any ego issues? He smiles at the question. "I never felt like I was an India player who now had to turn out for district-level teams. When you want to play cricket, you don't have the option to think about such things. After I played some 15-20 games like that they picked me for the Punjab side [for the Syed Mushtaq Ali tournament]." You sense he is glad - to just be back on his feet, able to do what he is good at.
But the comeback process was a grind he can never forget. For nearly 18 months VRV Singh had barely touched a ball. The question did come up, but not once did he feel that he should quit the game. "Giving up on cricket was never an option. If I had wanted to do that, I would have never gone in for this surgery. After surgery, I never thought that I won't play cricket. I always had it at the back of my mind that I want to make a comeback. The good thing is, I gave myself time to recover and didn't hurry back."
Though the ultimate objective was quite clear, there were obviously days when the enormity of the task would get to him. And that is where the encouragement from his parents proved to be crucial. "I think family support was the main thing. My parents had the biggest role to play in my comeback. You cannot go around paying attention to negative things said about you. What matters is that you should have the support of people close to you.
"There were days when I used to get frustrated with not playing or not being able to bowl. That is the time when they supported me. They told me to give myself some time, and wait till I was 100% fit and not jump in when I was, say, 90%. Little things matter, like when you are not able to bend to pick up something from the ground and they would do it for you."
 
 
"If a player has not played for more than two years then no [IPL] franchise is going to pick him. I wasn't depressed. I would have been depressed if I hadn't had the surgery. I am happy that I am back to normal. After the surgery I have become mentally tougher."
 
There were others who helped as well. "I have a good friend in Sydney, Surjit Singh, who supported me a lot. Also, Patrick Farhart [the Kings XI physiotherapist]."
He says he has also tweaked his action to lighten the load on his body. "I have changed it a bit and worked on my back-foot landing. Earlier I used to not think much [about my action], but after the surgery I thought that if I slightly modify it to front-on from side-on then it might help make my follow-through easier and it might not [put too much pressure] on the lower body. I tried it in Chandigarh and it was getting better. I am still working on it and hopefully by the middle of this year I will get there."
For now, a haul of eight wickets in four games at an economy-rate of 6.37 was quite satisfactory as Punjab made the Syed Mushtaq Ali final. The bounce he extracted in the competition was steep, the pace decent. "The more I play, the more pace and bounce I will get. I don't think my pace has reduced much after the surgery, it's still the same."
Someone asked him if he was depressed at not having an IPL contract. His reply said it all. "If a player has not played for more than two years then no franchise is going to pick him. I wasn't depressed. I would have been depressed if I hadn't had the surgery. I am happy that I am back to normal. After the surgery I have become mentally tougher. As a fast bowler, when you undergo surgeries, it is tough."
His major concern right now is the lack of match-practice options with the domestic season having ended. "You cannot improve much in local cricket. There will be a few Punjab off-season camps before the next Ranji Trophy. I'll keep working in the gym. But at the moment, matches toh hain nahin [are not there]."
VRV Singh is still not giving up though; he is being pro-active in dealing with this challenge. Immediately after the Syed Mushtaq Ali final he went up to his captain Harbhajan Singh and senior India fast bowler Munaf Patel to seek counsel about the best way to not only stay match fit but also mentally strong. Clearly VRV 2.0 is hungry. He does not want to lose his focus.
Sometimes, you can never win. For two-and-a-half years, he could hardly play. Now when he can, there are no avenues available. But for the moment, VRV Singh is happy about just being able to bowl again. Remind him of his early days, when it was all about pace for him, and he smiles knowingly again.
"I am more mature now. You are obviously wiser at 27 than when you are 21-22. I have understood my body much better now. That fire is still there [though]. It will always be there."

Friday, March 30, 2012

Fitting farcical end to meaningless game


South Africa v India, only T20, Johannesburg

Fitting farcical end to meaningless game

Perhaps its biggest failing was that the match was marketed as a tribute to Jacques Kallis. Only an invitation to contest a pillow-fight or a game of noughts and crosses would be a more ill-fitting way to honour him
Cricket +
Jacques Kallis acknowledges the applause as he walks back, South Africa v India, Only T20I, Johannesburg, March 30, 2012
Jacques Kallis has served South African cricket as a colossus of courage and class. This match was neither of those things. It was crass. © Associated Press 
Enlarge
Related Links
On any other day, this could have been an extraordinary game of Twenty20 cricket. South Africa smashed a total at almost 11 runs to the over, India's chase began speedily and the match was set up for a thrilling finish. Today was not that day, though. The game was labelled a farce and no matter which way you look at it, that's pretty much what it was.
Sure, all traditions have to start somewhere and this one is just trying to find its feet so it probably should be cut some slack. It had its beginnings at Moses Mabhida Stadium in Durban in January 2011, when the idea to have a marquee game to bid farewell to Makhaya Ntini became reality. Accompanied by a Bollywood concert, it was a novelty. If it was repeated once a year, at a suitable time, it would have been able to retain that novelty.
But the naked truth about the way it was handled this year is that it felt forced. Neither CSA nor the BCCI made any attempt to disguise how loudly money talks in their decision to have this game on this day. It has been slotted in a little over a week after India's journey at the Asia Cup ended, five days before the IPL begins and less than 48 hours after South Africa returned from their tour of New Zealand. Slotted in is giving it too much credit, it has been squeezed in the way a couch has to move through a doorway, awkwardly.
South Africa countered the scheduling maze by picking a squad that involved only one player who was in the Test squad in New Zealand - Lonwabo Tsotsobe, the most economical bowler of the night. Their fringe players, such as Colin Ingram and Farhaan Berhardien, gave a decent account of themselves but whether their performances will materialise into more chances to play international cricket is questionable. There's every chance that most of what happened in this match will be forgotten.
Gary Kirsten, the coach, suggested that South Africa would treat this match as a "fairly light-hearted" affair. In fact, they handled it with even less care than that.
The squad did not hold a single training session. Late on Thursday afternoon, the day before the match, Johan Botha had not even met Kirsten, nor did he have any idea about who would be in his starting XI. Two hours before the start, none of that had changed. Dane Vilas was clueless whether he would keep or Morne van Wyk would get the gloves. Tsotsobe had only just arrived from Port Elizabeth and didn't know if he would play. South Africa's management were sending a message that they would treat a match without context with the casualness it calls for.
India treated it with more respect. They arrived two days before with some of their best players, held a net session and discussed the match with sincerity. MS Dhoni usually has a hint of mischief in his voice but that only came when he left his press conference and slipped in this prophetic remark. "Let's hope it doesn't rain," Dhoni quipped. But, rain it did. The showers added a different dimension of meaninglessness to an already hollow game and almost fittingly brought it to its end.
Perhaps its biggest failing was that the match was marketed as a tribute to Jacques Kallis. Only an invitation to contest a pillow-fight or a game of noughts and crosses would be a more ill-fitting way to honour the all-rounder. Kallis has served South African cricket as a colossus of courage and class. This match was neither of those things. It was crass.
It had all the usual ingredients of a T20 match. Music, dancers, fireworks, cheeky shots, body-flinging fielding, and a constant drone around the stands that got louder and louder until it was deafening. Kallis and all that he has given South African cricket deserved more that. Actually, he probably deserved less. A less meaningless and more thoughtful way of showing appreciation for his service to the game. He also deserved it at a different time, considering retirement is not in his immediate plans.
The man himself would never say so and the money being given to his scholarship foundation softens the blow of such a garish gesture. If only the blow was not so hard to start off with.

South Africa v India


South Africa won by 11 runs (D/L method)
South Africa innings (20 overs maximum)RMB4s6sSR
View dismissalRE Levic Sharma b IK Pathan198740271.42
View dismissalJH Kallisc Sharma b Ashwin61584252145.23
View dismissalCA Ingramc Sharma b Raina78595083156.00
F Behardiennot out20221120181.81
View dismissalJL Ontongb Raina2210722314.28
JA Morkelnot out163312533.33
Extras(lb 1, w 2)3
Total(4 wickets; 20 overs; 79 mins)219(10.95 runs per over)
Did not bat J Botha*, DJ Vilas†, WD ParnellJ TheronLL Tsotsobe
Fall of wickets 1-22 (Levi, 1.4 ov)2-141 (Kallis, 14.6 ov)3-168 (Ingram, 17.1 ov)4-203 (Ontong, 19.3 ov)
BowlingOMRWEcon
P Kumar2022011.00(1w)
View wicketIK Pathan4044111.00(1w)
R Vinay Kumar3032010.66
View wicketR Ashwin403318.25
YK Pathan10909.00
View wicketsSK Raina4049212.25
RG Sharma1014014.00
V Kohli1015015.00
India innings (target: 83 runs from 7.5 overs)RMB4s6sSR
RV Uthappanot out1836191094.73
G Gambhirnot out49362871175.00
Extras(lb 3, w 1)4
Total(0 wickets; 7.5 overs; 36 mins)71(9.06 runs per over)
Did not bat V KohliRG SharmaSK RainaMS Dhoni*†, YK PathanIK PathanR AshwinP KumarR Vinay Kumar
BowlingOMRWEcon
LL Tsotsobe301505.00(1w)
JA Morkel1016016.00
J Theron1013013.00
WD Parnell1.501407.63
J Botha1010010.00
Match details
Toss India, who chose to field
Series South Africa won the one-off match
T20I debuts F Behardien and DJ Vilas (South Africa)
Player of the match CA Ingram (South Africa)
Umpires JD Cloete and S George
TV umpire AT Holdstock
Match referee BC Broad (England)
Reserve umpire KH Hurter
Match notes
  • South Africa innings
  • South Africa: 50 runs in 5.2 overs (32 balls), Extras 2
  • 2nd Wicket: 50 runs in 36 balls (JH Kallis 24, CA Ingram 24, Ex 2)
  • South Africa: 100 runs in 11.2 overs (68 balls), Extras 3
  • CA Ingram: 50 off 38 balls (6 x 4, 1 x 6)
  • JH Kallis: 50 off 36 balls (3 x 4, 2 x 6)
  • 2nd Wicket: 100 runs in 71 balls (JH Kallis 48, CA Ingram 50, Ex 2)
  • South Africa: 150 runs in 16.2 overs (98 balls), Extras 3
  • South Africa: 200 runs in 19.2 overs (116 balls), Extras 3
  • Innings Break: South Africa - 219/4 in 20.0 overs (F Behardien 20, JA Morkel 16)
  • India innings
  • India: 50 runs in 5.5 overs (35 balls), Extras 4
  • 1st Wicket: 50 runs in 35 balls (RV Uthappa 11, G Gambhir 35, Ex 4)
  • Rain: India - 71/0 in 7.5 overs (RV Uthappa 18, G Gambhir 49)